Next he published A Confession ofįaith Touching the Holy Trinity, according to the It stirred up great indignationĪnd was suppressed and burned by the common Published his paper, which makes a tract of thirty-eight small pages. They made answer to it, but did not move him. Westminster considered his case and to them he Meanwhile aĬommittee of the Assembly of Divines sitting at He was committed to the custody of one of the officers of the House of CommonsĪnd so continued for five years. Westminster to explain his position, and boldlyĪvowed his belief. Was summoned to appear before Parliament at HappilyĪ prominent citizen bailed him out. The committee of Parliament then at Gloucester,Īnd put in the common jail Dec. The existence of this paper and so he was cited before Refuted, and to these views he was faithful the rest The Deity of the Holy Spirit is clearly and fully Wherein the commonly received opinion touching To paper Twelve Arguments Drawn out of Scripture: In which he used more conventional languageĪnd was allowed to go free. Which was not satisfactory, and so he made a second Fearing imprisonment, he made a confession of faith (May 2, 1644) Unsoundness being reported to the city magistrates, To disbelieve the doctrine of the Trinity, and, his ![]() He was educated at Oxford, and appointed head master Of Gloucester), where he was baptized Jan. John Henry was offended sufficiently by the Yawkey legacy to pressure the city to change the name of Yawkey Way back to the original Jersey Street.BIDDLE, JOHN: A founder of modern English Can you imagine the impact if John Henry, Bob Kraft, Jeremy Jacobs, and Wyc Grousbeck, along with James, decided they’d had enough? Likely soon-to-be Attorney General Andrea Campbell and Suffolk DA Kevin Hayden, son of a prominent historian of the Black experience in Boston, would at least listen closely. The owners could jump-start a civil rights initiative with a “summit conference” on the issues. Let’s ask them to pool their power and come together on protecting the civil rights of Black fans. Mayor Wu is one of the nation’s most thoughtful municipal progressives. LeBron James is an influential part-owner of the Red Sox and a leading voice for racial equity. The four major sports clubs and the soccer team feature owners with professed progressive values. Surely, racist behavior is at least as onerous as peeing in the wrong restroom. It may seem hardline to revoke a privilege under such circumstances, but the action sent an unmistakable message: such disorder will not be tolerated. Remember the drunken brawling and gambling in the bleachers and far right field grandstand at Fenway? Remember smoking? Remember 2005, when a Massachusetts court upheld Bob Kraft’s revocation of a company’s season tickets, when a guy using the seats peed in an empty women’s room at Gillette? The guest claimed he was in a long line for the gents and suffered from a urological condition. They simply have to develop the will to do so. But experience and research show they can change fan behavior. Sports owners can’t change the minds of committed racists. “The perpetrator used verbal slurs while threatening or intimidating you.”.“The perpetrator interfered with your civil rights, including your right to use public parks, walk on public streets, attend school, or live peacefully in your home.“The perpetrator targeted you because of your race, national origin, religion, age, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or disability or protected activity (for example, the right to vote or the right to associate).The owners of the venues and the teams have evaded full responsibility for ensuring that their stadia are safe environments for all people.Īccording to a publication of the Massachusetts attorney general’s office, “Your rights may have been violated if: That is, it’s hard to believe we would not find at least some civil rights victimizations that have gone unreported. If we look in earnest, one suspects we would find at least some Black fans who would testify that that racialized treatment kept them at home. But we can just look around our stadia and see that Black fans are not there. I am not aware of any comprehensive review into whether the n-word has intimidated specific Black fans into feeling “they do not belong.” We do not know if specific management practices make specific Black people feel “they do not belong,” because we never have investigated. Our response to hate crimes can send a powerful message that these crimes will not be tolerated.” The attorney general’s web site says, “Along with the impact on individual victims, hate crimes send a message to members of groups that they do not belong, or will be hurt because they are perceived as different. It is a word like no other in the English language. To the first objection, one argues that history has weaponized the n-word.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |